<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content untill the end of days&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.iloveadsense.com/2006/03/26/content-untill-the-end-of-days/</link>
	<description>or: Blogging my AdSense Adventure</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.iloveadsense.com/2006/03/26/content-untill-the-end-of-days/#comment-650</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.iloveadsense.com/2006/03/26/content-untill-the-end-of-days/#comment-650</guid>
					<description>The article sites have hardly any original content. It is hard to get them ranking well in the search engines but I do get quite some traffic from Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article sites have hardly any original content. It is hard to get them ranking well in the search engines but I do get quite some traffic from Google.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.iloveadsense.com/2006/03/26/content-untill-the-end-of-days/#comment-614</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.iloveadsense.com/2006/03/26/content-untill-the-end-of-days/#comment-614</guid>
					<description>Problematic.... Theoretically Google does not like duplicated content. bad for PR, bad for ranking.
How's the articles working for you? do you have original content on your websites as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problematic&#8230;. Theoretically Google does not like duplicated content. bad for PR, bad for ranking.<br />
How&#8217;s the articles working for you? do you have original content on your websites as well?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
